Comments on: WinRAR 32-bit http://www.bytechip.com/2009/11/winrar-32-bit/ Technology Blog with updated news about Mobiles, Gadgets, Laptops, Windows, Linux, Tutorial, Internet, Web Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:53:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Arihant Shyamsukhahttp://www.bytechip.com/2009/11/winrar-32-bit/comment-page-1/#comment-98 Arihant Shyamsukha Thu, 12 Nov 2009 03:52:54 +0000 http://www.bytechip.com/?p=743#comment-98 thanks dude thanks dude

]]> By: Ramkumarhttp://www.bytechip.com/2009/11/winrar-32-bit/comment-page-1/#comment-97 Ramkumar Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:39:12 +0000 http://www.bytechip.com/?p=743#comment-97 Hi Arihant, 7zip is powerful, yet it consumes more resource than what winrar does. The compression ratio is good. But I think its the time and high resource factor, Y people prefer to use WinRAR instead of 7-zip. Hi Arihant, 7zip is powerful, yet it consumes more resource than what winrar does. The compression ratio is good. But I think its the time and high resource factor, Y people prefer to use WinRAR instead of 7-zip.

]]> By: Arihant Shyamsukhahttp://www.bytechip.com/2009/11/winrar-32-bit/comment-page-1/#comment-96 Arihant Shyamsukha Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:19:11 +0000 http://www.bytechip.com/?p=743#comment-96 yaar 7-Zip is i think better can u just do research a little. it may have problem that i dont know but it is free, and it have more option i mean it can decompress more files arihant yaar 7-Zip is i think better can u just do research a little. it may have problem that i dont know but it is free, and it have more option i mean it can decompress more files

arihant

]]>